Amazon Amazon (NASD:AMZN) has sued New York State claiming that a newly passed law governing sales tax for affiliate programs is unconstitutional and that it unfairly singles out a single company (Amazon).

The law was originally proposed by former Governor Eliot Spitzer before he was otherwise distracted. It was signed into law last week by new Governor David Paterson as part of the budget bill. The State estimates that it would raise approximately $50 million per year in tax revenue.

At the heart of the bill is Amazon’s affiliate sales program. States have been eyeballing Internet sales tax in recent years, trying to figure out how to get a piece of it. But, it’s been off limits until now. New York lawmakers believe that they found a way around it by suggesting that through its affiliate program, Amazon in essence creates a tax nexus in every state in which it has even a single affiliate. And, precedents enable states to collect sales tax on any sales in their state by companies which have such a nexus, even if the sales are not made through that affiliate.

This, of course, is nonsense. Tax nexus laws were originally written for brick and mortar businesses. So, if Barnes & Noble has stores in New York, they can’t avoid having their customers circumvent the tax by buying online. But Amazon has no brick and mortar presence. The original rational behind sales taxes were that they would pay for the local services provided to those stores - police protection, street cleaning, roads and parking, etc. Amazon doesn’t use those services and the presence of an affiliate program doesn’t change that. As Amazon points out, an affiliate program is simply an alternate means of marketing. To suggest an affiliate program constitutes a physical presence in the state would be like suggesting that someone who buys banner ads on a New York State-headquartered website would have a local presence. But, the attraction of tax dollars plus a desire to help local businesses obviously drove policy in this case.

I hope the courts overturn the law and do so quickly. Tax nexus policy can be a slippery slope. There are other states who have taken aggressive postures in this area (Maryland and Massachusetts come to mind) and it’s not good for business nor does it help the state attract business. If Congress wishes to apply sales tax to all Internet purchases, that’s their prerogative. But to base tax collection on the marketing programs an ecommerce company uses makes no sense at all.

SOURCE

If you liked this, You might also like:

1. Sen. Bill Forces eBay, Amazon, Google to Report Transactions
2. This is a provision with huge reach, and was slipped into the bill this week. Not only does it affect...
3. Amazon Is Down. Very Down.
4. When a service as big as Amazon is unavailable, you expect at least a message along the lines of...
5. “Will It Blend” Videos Boost Sales 5x
6. “Will It Blend” Videos Boost Sales 5x September 27, 2007 — 09:46 PM PDT — by Kristen Nicole —...
7. T-Mobile Sues Starbucks, Says It Jumped The Gun On Free Wi-Fi
8. Only several days have passed since Starbucks and AT&T officially made available free Wi-Fi to US customers (upon purchase,...
9. ComScore: Quarterly E-Commerce Sales Hit $47.5 Billion
10. By Evan Schuman E-commerce spending in the United States for this year's second quarter jumped 19 percent, to $47.5...
11. Writers Strike to Increase DVD Sales
12. It has been a long 9 weeks and 2 days since the Writers Guild of America began their strike against...
13. Amazon Fulfillment Web Service
14. eCommerce fullfillment service Link to the Source...
15. Recycling Ideas
16. Back in 2000, then New York Gov. George E. Pataki "proposed building one of the first museums in the country...
17. Blue Art 2×1 sales event!
18. Now and for a limited time only, buy one and get one free! Any combo you want.... 2 MCM or...
19. Deals Steals & Sales - Pieces Under $50 to Plush your Pod!
20. As I was scouring my home-away-from-home, Kaboodle.com, I found some gems that I thought I would share with you. Some...